Näytönastekatsaukset

Effectiveness of acupuncture in patients with lateral tendinopathy

Näytönastekatsaukset
22.6.2022
Marja Mikkelsson

Level of evidence: C

Acupuncture might have small positive effects on pain intensity, pain-related disability, and strength (mean differences - 0.66, -0.51 and 0.36), compared with sham, placebo or another control intervention. However, electroacupuncture showed no significant effects on these outcomes.

In treating lateral tendinopathy, acupuncture may be more effective in short-term follow-up compared to medicine or steroid injections, but the differences of effectiveness were small, and the outcome parameter called “clinical efficacy rate” was poorly described. No reliable conclusion can be drawn on the effect of acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture due to poor quality of studies. Conclusions about long-term effectiveness cannot be drawn due to short follow-up times.

The results were based on meta-analysis of 10 RCTs with high risk of bias, and on meta-analysis of 14 RCTs (10 of acupuncture, and 4 of electroacupuncture, compared with sham or placebo acupuncture or electroacupuncture or other control intervention) with low to high risk of bias and high heterogeneity.

Table 1. Description of the included studies
ReferenceStudy typePopulationIntervention and comparisonOutcomesRisk of bias
«Zhou Y, Guo Y, Zhou R ym. Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Res Manag 2020;2020:8506591 »1MA of RCTs796 patients from 10 RCTs diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis, 431 in intervention group and 365 in control groupAcupuncture therapy (manual or electroacupuncture) compared with sham acupuncture or medicine or blocking therapy (steroid injections)Clinical efficacy rate and VASHigh
«Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Gómez-Chiguano GF ym. Effects of manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture for lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin: a systematic review and meta-ana»2MA of RCTs506 patients from 10 RCTs with lateral epicondylalgia (or lateral elbow pain/epicondylitis/tennis elbow/lateral elbow tendinopathy

218 patients from 4 RCTs with lateral epicondylalgia (or lateral elbow pain/epicondylitis/tennis elbow/lateral elbow tendinopathy
Needle/manual acupuncture including auricular acupuncture compared with sham or placebo or control or another active intervention

Needle/manual electroacupuncture compared with sham or placebo or combined with tui na (Chinese massage in 1 study)
Primary outcome: Pain intensity or related disability

Secondary outcome: hand-grip strength
High risk of bias in blinding of therapist, or participants, or due to incomplete outcome data

RCT=randomized controlled trial; SR=systematic review; MA=meta-analysis, VAS= visual analogue scale

Table 2. Additional comments for included studies
ReferenceComments
«Zhou Y, Guo Y, Zhou R ym. Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Res Manag 2020;2020:8506591 »1Most included studies were of poor methodological quality: risk of bias was related to randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, and reporting of dropouts, and in addition to publication bias. The studies had mostly small sample sizes and outcome measures were not consistent. In addition, the intensity of the treatment varied. The concept of "clinical efficacy rate" was poorly determined. The clinical efficacy rate was reported in 8 trials and visual analogue scale in 6 trials.
«Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Gómez-Chiguano GF ym. Effects of manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture for lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin: a systematic review and meta-ana»2 According to PEDRO scale methodological quality of all trials ranged from 5 to 8 out of 10 points. However, no trial was able to blind therapist, and 50% of trials could not blind participants. Clinical heterogeneity of acupuncture trials may have led to inconsistent results (In 5 trials comparison with sham acupuncture and in 5 trials different therapies (sham laser, manual therapy, shockwave therapy, conventional treatment with rest, NSAIDs, bracing exercise)

Results

Table 3. Outcome 1: Clinical efficacy rate
ReferenceNumber of studies and number of patients (I/C)Follow-up timeAbsolute number of events (%) IAbsolute number of events (%) CRelative effect (95% CI)
Level of evidence: low. The level of evidence is downgraded due to study limitations, inconsistency and imprecision.
«Zhou Y, Guo Y, Zhou R ym. Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Res Manag 2020;2020:8506591 »12 RCTs, acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture 68/62no follow-up58 (85)31(50)Risk ratio 1.95 (0.78, 4.90)

I= intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval

Table 4. Outcome 2: Visual analogue scale
ReferenceNumber of studies and number of patients (I/C)Follow-up timeMean difference (95% CI)
Level of evidence: low. The level of evidence is downgraded due to study limitations, inconsistency and imprecision.
«Zhou Y, Guo Y, Zhou R ym. Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Res Manag 2020;2020:8506591 »12 RCTs, acupuncture vs. sham acupuncture 48/47no follow-up-1.32 (-3.24, 0.60)

I= intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval

Table 5. Outcome 3: Pain intensity (Visual analogue scale or numerical pain rating)
ReferenceNumber of studies and number of patients (I/C)Follow-up timeSMD (95% CI)
Level of evidence: low. The level of evidence is downgraded due to inconsistency in both trial groups, and due to imprecision in electroacupuncture studies.
«Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Gómez-Chiguano GF ym. Effects of manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture for lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin: a systematic review and meta-ana»27 RCTs of acupuncture 194/1860–12–24 weeks or more-0.66 (95% CI -1.22 to -0.1)
4 RCTs of electroacupuncture

108/109
0–12 weeks-0.08 (95% CI -0.99 to 0.83

I= intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval; Standardized mean difference

Table 6. Outcome 4: Pain related disability
ReferenceNumber of studies and number of patients (I/C)Follow-up timeStd, Mean Difference (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate. The level of evidence is downgraded due to study limitations, inconsistency and imprecision.
«Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Gómez-Chiguano GF ym. Effects of manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture for lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin: a systematic review and meta-ana»27 RCTs of acupuncture 225/2210–12–24 weeks or more-0.51 (95% CI -0.91 to -0.11)

I= intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval

Table 7. Outcome 5: Strength
ReferenceNumber of studies and number of patients (I/C)Follow-up timeStd, Mean Difference (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate in acupuncture trials, low in electroacupuncture trials. The level of evidence is downgraded due to inconsistency and imprecision.
«Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Gómez-Chiguano GF ym. Effects of manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture for lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin: a systematic review and meta-ana»26 RCTs of acupuncture 287/2660–12–24 weeks or more0.36 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.57
2 RCTs of electroacupuncture 19/20 0–12 weeks0.34 (95% CI -0.29 to 0.98)

I= intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval

References

  1. Zhou Y, Guo Y, Zhou R ym. Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Res Manag 2020;2020:8506591 «PMID: 32318130»PubMed
  2. Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Gómez-Chiguano GF ym. Effects of manual acupuncture and electroacupuncture for lateral epicondylalgia of musculoskeletal origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acupunct Med 2021;39:405-422 «PMID: 33334116»PubMed