Lisätietoa aiheesta

Variability of visual field examinations

Lisätietoa aiheesta
28.3.2023
Glaucoma Working Group

Visual field examination seems to be dependent on the patient’s response, which shows variation both during and between the tests.

Kirjallisuutta

  1. Heijl A, Drance SM. Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 1983;67:512-6 «PMID: 6871143»PubMed
  2. Langerhorst C. The fatigue phenomenon in prolonged threshold testing. In automated perimetry in glaucoma. Kugler Publications, 1988, s. 53-65
  3. Hudson C, Wild JM, O'Neill EC. Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:268-80 «PMID: 8300355»PubMed
  4. Birt CM, Shin DH, Samudrala V ym. Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1126-30 «PMID: 9224465»PubMed
  5. Heijl A. Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1977;55:696-708 «PMID: 578374»PubMed
  6. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1544-9 «PMID: 3675288»PubMed
  7. Lewis RA, Johnson CA, Keltner JL ym. Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers. Ophthalmology 1986;93:878-81 «PMID: 3763131»PubMed
  8. Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Zangwill L ym. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:309-13 «PMID: 10704545»PubMed
  9. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:165-9 «PMID: 9591946»PubMed
  10. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:268-72 «PMID: 9686835»PubMed
  11. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999;77:125-9 «PMID: 10321523»PubMed
  12. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999;77:143-6 «PMID: 10321527»PubMed
  13. Bengtsson B, Lindgren A, Heijl A ym. Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:184-8 «PMID: 9197570»PubMed
  14. Bengtsson B. Reliability of computerized perimetric threshold tests as assessed by reliability indices and threshold reproducibility in patients with suspect and manifest glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:519-22 «PMID: 11037906»PubMed
  15. Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA ym. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1152-61 «PMID: 10235548»PubMed
  16. Glass E, Schaumberger M, Lachenmayr BJ. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:1847-54 «PMID: 7635658»PubMed
  17. Schaumberger M, Schäfer B, Lachenmayr BJ. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:1390-7 «PMID: 7775117»PubMed
  18. Flanagan JG, Wild JM, Trope GE. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. Ophthalmology 1993;100:949-54 «PMID: 8510911»PubMed
  19. O'Brien C, Poinoosawmy D, Wu J ym. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:516-9 «PMID: 7918261»PubMed
  20. Weber J, Klimaschka T. Test time and efficiency of the dynamic strategy in glaucoma perimetry. Ger J Ophthalmol 1995;4:25-31 «PMID: 7612076»PubMed
  21. Maeda H, Nakaura M, Negi A. New perimetric threshold test algorithm with dynamic strategy and tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in glaucomatous eyes. Eye (Lond) 2000;14 Pt 5:747-51 «PMID: 11116697»PubMed
  22. Morales J, Weitzman ML, González de la Rosa M. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 2000;107:134-42 «PMID: 10647732»PubMed
  23. Lachkar Y, Barrault O, Lefrançois A ym. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer]. J Fr Ophtalmol 1998;21:180-4 «PMID: 9759403»PubMed
  24. Anderson DR, Feuer WJ, Alward WL ym. Threshold equivalence between perimeters. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:493-505 «PMID: 2712132»PubMed
  25. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L ym. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2144-53 «PMID: 10571351»PubMed
  26. Gordon MO, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:573-83 «PMID: 10326953»PubMed
  27. Musch DC, Lichter PR, Guire KE ym. The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology 1999;106:653-62 «PMID: 10201583»PubMed